Free Shipping Over £25!
Or click and collect!
Or click and collect!
Could the Vape Tax Push People Back to Smoking?
Legal Guides
This is one of the most important questions in the vape tax debate and one that divides public health opinion. Here is an honest assessment of the evidence and the arguments on both sides.
Genuine
Concern Raised by Royal College of Physicians and ASH
Price
Sensitive
Lower-Income Switchers Most at Risk of Reverting to Cigarettes
Rate
Differential
Maintained by Design, But Critics Argue It Is Not Enough
The central concern
Could the Vape Tax Push People Back to Smoking?
Yes, for a specific group, the risk is real
Lower-income switchers for whom price is a primary motivation are most at risk
The concern that the vape tax could push some ex-smokers back to cigarettes is taken seriously by major UK health organisations including the Royal College of Physicians and ASH. The argument is not that the tax will reverse the switching trend for the majority of vapers, for most people, the financial, health and social advantages of vaping over smoking are compelling enough to withstand a moderate price increase. The concern is more specific: for lower-income switchers for whom the cost advantage of vaping over smoking is the primary or decisive motivation for staying off cigarettes, a substantial price increase narrows or removes the financial reason to vape rather than smoke.
The arguments
The Case For and Against This Concern
Who Is at Greatest Risk of Reverting?
The risk of the vape tax driving a return to smoking is not evenly distributed across all vapers. It is concentrated in two groups. First, lower-income ex-smokers for whom the cost of cigarettes is most burdensome and the financial case for vaping is therefore most important. Research consistently shows that smoking prevalence is higher in lower-income communities and that cost is a more significant factor in cessation decisions for these groups than for higher-income smokers. Second, relatively recent switchers who have not yet built up the strong habit and health motivations to vape that longer-term vapers possess, for whom a modest financial nudge back toward cigarettes could be more influential.
The Counter-Argument: Price Differential Is Maintained
The government and its supporters argue that the vape duty is calibrated to maintain a meaningful price differential between vaping and smoking. Even at £2.20 per 10ml, a typical vaping habit will still cost substantially less than an equivalent cigarette habit. The tobacco duty escalator continues to increase cigarette costs annually. From this perspective, the tax narrows but does not close the cost gap, and most vapers who have made the switch for cost reasons will still be financially better off vaping than smoking after the duty comes in.
What the Evidence Shows From Other Markets
Several countries that have introduced vaping taxes have seen some evidence of reduced vaping uptake following price increases, though methodological challenges make it difficult to isolate the effect of tax specifically from other market changes. The most relevant evidence comes from US state-level taxes on vaping products, where some studies have found associations between tax-induced price increases and reduced vaping combined with some evidence of increased smoking among price-sensitive groups. This is not conclusive but it adds weight to the concern raised by UK health organisations.
The Distributional Concern
The vape tax, like all consumption taxes on mass-market products, is regressive, it takes a larger proportion of income from lower-income households than from higher-income ones. Given that smoking prevalence is already concentrated in lower-income communities, a tax that makes vaping less financially accessible to this group risks entrenching smoking inequality. This is the distributive justice argument that sits alongside the purely clinical public health concern about reversion rates.
"This is the question that concerns us most as a retailer that serves a diverse community in Leicester. The people for whom cost is the most important factor in staying off cigarettes are exactly the people least well-served by a price increase."
Touch of Vape team, LeicesterThe practical picture
What This Means for Leicester Vapers
01
Vaping will still be cheaper than smoking for most habit levels
At the announced duty rates, a typical vaping habit remains substantially cheaper than the equivalent cigarette consumption. Most vapers will not face a situation where cigarettes become comparably or more affordable.
02
Step down to nicotine-free before October 2026 to reduce your exposure
Zero-nicotine products attract a lower duty rate. Completing the step-down reduces your exposure to the higher duty on nicotine products.
03
NHS Stop Smoking support can help if you are struggling
If the cost increase makes you consider returning to cigarettes, NHS Stop Smoking services provide free support for all cessation methods including vaping-assisted cessation.
04
Talk to our Leicester team about value options in our range
We will continue to offer the best possible value in our range and will work to absorb as much of the cost increase as commercially viable.
Touch of Vape Leicester
Worried About the Cost Impact? Our Leicester Team Will Help You Find the Best Value
We are on our customers' side in this debate. Come in and we will help you minimise the impact of the tax on your costs.
To find our Leicester store, visit our Vape Shop Leicester page.
From our Legal guide
Part of our Legal guide
Legal Guides
Our Legal guide covers the vape tax debate in full, including the public health concerns about reversion to smoking.
Find more vape tax guides in our Legal guide.
More from our Legal Guides
Related Legal Guides
Concerned About the Vape Tax? Our Leicester Team Is Too: Come and Talk to Us.
We will do everything we can to keep vaping accessible for our Leicester community.